Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 27400

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : OC01 - OC04 Full Version

Association Between Cycle Threshold Value of Cartridge-Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test and Clinical Severity of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64685.18292
N Sahana, S Rajesh Kumar Jain, M Manjunath

1. Senior Resident, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Navodaya Medical College and Research Institute, Raichur, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
N Sahana,
#19, 4th Main, Paramahamsa Road, Yadavgiri, Mysore-570020, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: Sahuvinu1994@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major global health problem caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). The National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP) emphasises early diagnosis and treatment of TB cases. The Cartridge-Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (CBNAAT) is a semi-automated molecular assay that rapidly detects MTB Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) and Rifampicin (RIF) resistance-associated mutations using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR).

Aim: This cross-sectional study aims to assess the association between the Cycle Threshold (Ct) value of CBNAAT and the clinical severity of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB).

Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Navodaya Medical College Hospital and Research Centre-Raichur, from January 2020 to July 2021. A sample size of 106 participants, aged ≥18 years and meeting the NTEP guidelines for presumptive PTB cases, were enrolled. Participants underwent chest radiography, sputum smear microscopy for Acid-Fast Bacilli (AFB), and CBNAAT testing. Clinical severity of PTB was categorised as mild, moderate, or severe using the Bandim TB score. Data was entered into Microsoft Excel 2017, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23. Descriptive statistics, frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations were calculated, and the chi-square test was utilised to assess associations between qualitative variables.

Results: Among the participants, the majority (55.7%, n=59) had moderate clinical severity. Of these, 12.3% (n=13) had high CBNAAT Ct values, 20.8% (n=22) had medium Ct values, 11.3% (n=12) had low Ct values, and 11.3% (n=12) had very low Ct values. A total of 31.1% (n=33) had severe clinical severity, with 13.2% (n=6) having high Ct values, 12.3% (n=13) having medium Ct values, and 6.6% (n=7) each having low and very low Ct values. Additionally, 13.2% (n=14) had mild clinical severity, with 0.9% (n=1) having high Ct values, 3.8% (n=4) having medium Ct values, 5.7% (n=6) having low Ct values, and 2.8% (n=3) having very low Ct values. The chi-square value was 4.697, with a p-value of 0.58.

Conclusion: There is no association between the Ct value of CBNAAT and the clinical severity of PTB.

Keywords

Clinical severity, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Real time polymerase chain reaction

TB is a communicable, preventable, and curable disease caused by MTB bacilli. India is the largest country in the Southeast Asian region, with an annual incidence of 210 TB cases per 100,000 population in 2021. Among the notified TB cases in 2021, 75.2% were PTB cases, and 24.8% were EPTB cases (1). Microscopy has high specificity but low sensitivity. The gold standard test for diagnosing TB is culture on solid and liquid media. The main disadvantage of culture on solid media is the delay in detection (6-8 weeks). Liquid culture media such as BacT/ALERT system, Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT), Microscopic Observation Drug Susceptibility Assay (MODS), and Bactec 460TB systems provide results in about 7 to 10 days, but they are costlier and require subculture on solid media (2). To overcome these limitations, there is increased focus on Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT). Among NAAT, conventional PCR was the first to emerge (3).

The use of specific primers and targets plays an important role in determining the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Primers such as repetitive insertion sequence IS6110 are commonly used. They are specific to the members of the MTB complex and are present in multiple copies in the MTBC genome. Various other gene targets have been used for TB detection. The decreased sensitivity of the test is due to the presence of PCR inhibitors in the samples. The decreased specificity is due to cross-contamination from heavily loaded samples, laboratory machinery, or work surfaces contaminated with amplicons. RT-PCR technology enables direct identification of MTB in clinical samples and provides faster results than other conventional methods. The advantage of this method is the absence of cross-contamination since no opening of tubes after amplification is required. In general, RT-PCR is an alternative to conventional PCR for MTB detection from biological samples, especially for species differentiation and drug resistance detection. CBNAAT, developed by the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), utilises a single disposable cartridge containing a sample processing system and an automated heminested RT-PCR. It can simultaneously detect the presence of MTB and its resistance to RIF (4). Different studies from India have reported varying sensitivity (61%-100%) using in-house PCR methods targeting different genes (4),(5),(6).

CBNAAT detects MTB and RIF resistance by amplifying the RIF Resistance Determining Region (RRDR) of the rpo-B gene and subsequently probing this region for RIF resistance mutations.

Several small studies on clinical samples have reported that the sensitivity of the test is 98% to 100%, and the specificity is 100%. In smear-negative cases, the sensitivity is 72% (7),(8). One study inferred that nearly 95% of Rifampicin Resistant (RR) TB cases have mutations in an 81-bp region (9).

CBNAAT requires less technical expertise, minimal laboratory facilities, and provides results within two hours. This makes it an efficient tool for early diagnosis and treatment of TB, particularly in cases of EPTB, HIV-TB co-infection, and pediatric TB. Thus, it is more effective in paucibacillary cases (8).

CBNAAT is also known as Gene Xpert, so the CBNAAT Ct value is also referred to as Xpert Ct values. The interpretation of the CBNAAT result is based on the CBNAAT Ct value, categorised as high, medium, low, and very low (10). The CBNAAT Ct value is a continuous variable and is inversely correlated with the concentration of the starting material. However, the clinical significance of the CBNAAT Ct value has not been extensively explored in previous studies. Therefore, the present study aims to assess the association between the Ct value and the clinical severity of PTB.

Material and Methods

An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Navodaya Medical College Hospital and Research Centre-Raichur, from January 2020 to July 2021, for a period of 19 months, with a sample size of 106, after obtaining Ethical Committee Clearance from the Institutional Ethical Committee (Letter No. ECC/24/2019).

Inclusion criteria: Patients of age ≥18 years who are newly diagnosed PTB cases on the basis of CBNAAT by MTB detection were included in the study after written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria: Those patients who were old diagnosed PTB cases and already on Anti-tubercular Therapy (ATT) were excluded from the study.

Procedure

Methodology: After obtaining informed consent, presumptive PTB cases as per NTEP guidelines, aged ≥18 years, were enrolled in the study. Patients with pulmonary symptoms of cough lasting more than two weeks, along with weight loss, night sweats, breathlessness, hemoptysis, chest pain, and fever, were clinically diagnosed as presumptive TB as per NTEP guidelines (11). They were categorised into mild, moderate, and severe groups according to the Bandim TB score (12), which is based on signs, symptoms, and clinical findings. These include cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, chest pain, night sweats, as well as signs like anemic conjunctiva, tachycardia, positive lung auscultation findings, axillary temperature >37.0°C, Body Mass Index (BMI) <18, and Middle Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) <200 mm. X-ray examinations were performed on patients with suggestive findings, and sputum samples were collected for microscopy examination in both smear-positive and smear-negative cases. CBNAAT was conducted to confirm the presence of MTB bacilli and detect Rifampicin resistance. The details of each participant were recorded in a proforma.

Samples that tested positive for MTB, either rifampicin-sensitive or RR, were further subjected to first-line Line Probe Assay (LPA) to check for isoniazid resistance. Samples that were smear-negative but CBNAAT-positive, with a past history of PTB, rifampicin resistance, or isoniazid resistance, were processed for liquid culture. Among cases in whom MTB was detected in CBNAAT, the association between CBNAAT Ct value and clinical severity was correlated. CBNAAT Ct value was categorised as high, medium, low, or very low. MTB was considered detected when at least two of the five probes showed positive signals with a Ct of ≤38 cycles. The concentration of bacilli was semiquantitatively estimated based on the Ct range (Ct >28 indicates very low,

• 22-28 indicates low,
• 16-22 indicates medium,
• <16 indicates high) (10).

Statistical Analysis

The data was entered into Microsoft Excel 2017 version, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23. Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies and percentages, were calculated for qualitative data, while the mean and Standard Deviation (SD) were calculated for quantitative data. The chi-square test was used to determine the association between qualitative variables.

Results

(Table/Fig 1) presents the age and gender distribution of the study subjects, showing that the most common age group affected in our study was 18 to 30 years, contributing to 34.9% of the cases. The mean age of the study participants was 41.73±14.78. The majority of the subjects were male (77/106), accounting for 72.64%.

(Table/Fig 2) shows the comorbidities among the study subjects, with 41.5% of them having comorbidities, with diabetes mellitus being the most common comorbidity, observed in 24.50% of the cases.

(Table/Fig 3) presents the Chest X-ray (CXR) findings among the study subjects, revealing that the majority of the patients (39.6%) had bilateral cavitatory lesions.

(Table/Fig 4) shows the zone of involvement in CXR among PTB patients, with the majority (35.6%) having involvement in all zones of the CXR. Five (4.7%) of them had no significant changes in their CXR.

(Table/Fig 5) displays the clinical severity of the disease among PTB cases, with the majority (55.7%) classified as having moderate clinical severity.

(Table/Fig 6) demonstrates the RIF resistance detected in CBNAAT among PTB patients, with the majority (77.4%) showing RIF resistance.

(Table/Fig 7) shows the Ct CBNAAT values of PTB patients, with the majority (36.8%) having a medium Ct CBNAAT value.

(Table/Fig 8) presents the association between CBNAAT Ct Value and clinical severity.

Discussion

There are knowledge gaps in the in-depth analysis of the Ct value of CBNAAT and its clinical implications. Some studies have compared the Ct value of CBNAAT with smear microscopy (13),(14),(15),(16), while others have explored the correlation of Ct categories with culture positivity and time to positivity (17). However, the clinical correlation of CBNAAT Ct value has not been extensively explored. Therefore, this institutional-based study was conducted to evaluate the association between CBNAAT Ct value and the 3clinical severity of PTB in 106 subjects in whom MTB was detected in CBNAAT with various categories of Ct values. The study aimed to correlate the association between CBNAAT Ct value and the clinical severity of PTB. The p-value in the present study was 0.58, indicating no association between CBNAAT Ct value and the clinical severity of PTB.

The negative correlation between CBNAAT Ct values and smear grades of 0.55 falls within the range of correlations observed in South Africa. Hanrahan et al., reported correlations ranging from 0.54 to 0.74 in South Africa (13). A study conducted by Najjingo et al., among TB patients from five referral hospitals in Uganda found that CBNAAT Ct values were minimally comparable to smear microscopy in assessing mycobacterial burden (14). Another study by Prakash et al., on the clinical utility of Gene Xpert/MTB-RIF Ct values in diagnosing TB highlighted reduced sensitivity, particularly in samples with very low MTB bacillary load. In contrast, samples with high MTB bacillary loads showed a stronger correlation between Gene Xpert/MTB-RIF Ct values and MTB culture (17).

(Table/Fig 9) depicts the age distribution of the study participants in comparison with other studies. The majority (34.9%) belonged to the 18-30 years age group. The mean age of the study participants was 39.74±13.99 years. Similar findings were observed in a study conducted by Panda et al., (18). Irene Najjingo et al., conducted a study in Uganda which showed that 51.2% of their participants were in the 18-32 years age group (14).

In the present study, the majority of the subjects were males, accounting for approximately 72.64% as shown in Table/Figure 1. Similarly, in the study conducted by Irene Najjingo ID et al., the majority of the subjects were male, comprising about 67.4% (14).

In the present study, among 106 cases, the majority (24.5%) had Diabetes Mellitus, as shown in (Table/Fig 3). A study conducted by Bhattacharya P et al., in 2017 on 173 selected patients reported that comorbidities were present in 92 (53.17%) patients, of whom 26.58% had diabetes mellitus and 17.34% had hypertension. In this study, the majority of the patients also had Diabetes Mellitus (19).

In the present study, the CXR findings are shown in (Table/Fig 4). Among the 106 cases, the majority (39.6%) had Bilateral Cavitatory lesions. A study conducted by Panda RK et al., at JNM Medical College, Raipur on 68 selected patients revealed that 19 (27.9%) had consolidation on CXR, 16 (23.5%) had fibrocavitary lesions on CXR, 8 (11.7%) had nodules on CXR, 14 (20.5%) had infiltration on CXR, and 2 (2.9%) had miliary shadow on CXR (18).

In the present study, the majority (55.7%) of the cases had a moderate type of clinical severity. Due to a p-value greater than 0.05, there was no significant association between the clinical and radiological features of patients with CBNAAT Ct value. A study conducted by Bharadwaj AK et al., found that sputum positivity was significantly associated with cavitatory lesions on CXR (20).

In the present study, among the 106 cases with MTB detected in CBNAAT, the majority (36.8%) had a medium CBNAAT Ct value, as shown in Table/Figure 7. In a study conducted by Prakash AK et al., on the clinical utility of the cycle threshold value of GeneXpert MTB/RIF (CBNAAT) and its diagnostic accuracy in pulmonary and extra-pulmonary samples at a tertiary care centre in India, among 162 patients with MTB detected in CBNAAT, 13 had a high CBNAAT Ct value, 52 had a medium CBNAAT Ct value, 63 had a low CBNAAT Ct value, and 34 had a very low CBNAAT Ct value (17).

Since the p-value was greater than 0.05, there was no significant association between CBNAAT Ct value and the clinical severity of PTB. Therefore, further studies with sufficient sample size should be conducted to assess the association. It is recommended to perform larger multicentric studies that include subjects with both PTB and EPTB to assess the association with CBNAAT Ct value.

Limitation(s)

Since the sample size is small, the results cannot be extrapolated to the general population. Additionally, it should be noted that the present study did not include cases of EPTB (Extra-Pulmonary Tuberculosis).

Conclusion

CBNAAT is a robust diagnostic tool for the early detection of TB, and its results are interpreted based on CBNAAT Ct value. However, due to the small sample size in the present study, there was a weak correlation between the clinical severity of PTB and CBNAAT Ct value. As a result, the clinical significance of the CBNAAT value could not be assessed. Therefore, further studies with a larger sample size are needed to evaluate the clinical significance of the CBNAAT Ct value.

References

1.
Global tuberculosis Report 2021. https://www.who.int/publication/i/item/ 9789240037021 world health organization. (Last cited on 31/5/23).
2.
Pai M, Kalantri S, Dheda K. New tools and emerging technologies for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: Part II. Active tuberculosis and drug resistance. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2006;6(3):423-32. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Pai M, Ramsay A, O’brien R. Evidence based tuberculosis diagnosis. PLoS Med. 2008;5(7):e156. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Weyer K, Carai S, Nunn P. Viewpoint TB diagnostics: What does the world really need? J Infect Dis. 2011;204(suppl 4):S1196-S1202. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Greco S, Rulli M, Girardi E, Piersimoni C, Saltini C. Diagnostic accuracy of in-house PCR for pulmonary tuberculosis in smear-positive patients: Meta-analysis and metaregression. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(3):569 76. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Kulkarni S, Singh P, Memon A, Nataraj G, Kanade S, Kelkar R, et al. An in-house multiplex PCR test for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, its validation & comparison with a single target TB-PCR kit. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135(5):788-94.
7.
Blakemore R, Story E, Helb D, Kop J, Banada P, Owens MR, et al. Evaluation of the analytical performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2010:48(7):2495-501. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Helb D, Jones M, Story E, Boehme C, Wallace E, Ho K, et al. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampin resistance by use of on-demand, near-patient technology. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(1):229-37. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Van Der Zanden AG, Te Koppele-Vije EM, Vijaya N, Bhanu D, Van Soolingen LM. Use of DNA extracts from ZiehlNeelsen-stained slides for molecular detection of rifampin resistance and spoligotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(3):1101-08. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Semiquantitative Results Interpretation in CBNAAT | knowledge Base ntep.in https://ntep.in/node/1690/CP-semiquantitative-results-interpretation-cbnaat (cited on 30\6\2023).
11.
Guidelines: Central TB Dvision. https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1. (Cited on: Apr 1, 2023). [crossref]
12.
Rudolf F, Joaquim LC, Vieira C, Bjerregaard-Andersen M, Andersen A, Erlandsen M. The Bandim tuberculosis score: Reliability and comparison with the Karnofsky performance score. Scand J Infect Dis [Internet]. 2013;45(4):256-64. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2012.731077. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Hanrahan CF, Theron G, Bassett J, Dheda K, Scott L. Xpert MTB/RIF as a measure of sputum bacillary burden. Variation by HIV status and immunosuppression. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(11):1426-34. https://doi.org/10.1164/ rccm.201312-2140OC. PMID: 24786895. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Najjingo I. Comparison of GeneXpert cycle threshold values with smear microscopy and culture as a measure of mycobacterial burden in five regional referral hospitals of Uganda-A cross-sectional study. PLoS One [Internet]. 2019;14(5):e0216901. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0216901. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Blakemore R, Nabeta P, Davidow AL, Vadwai V, Tahirli R, Munsamy V, et al. A multisite assessment of the quantitative capabilities of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2011;184(9):1076-84. Doi: 10.1164/rccm.201103-0536OC. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Theron G, Peter J, van Zyl-Smit R, Mishra H, Streicher E, Murray S, et al. Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a high HIV prevalence setting. Am J Respir Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2011;184(1):132- 40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201101-0056oc. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Prakash AK, Datta B, Tripathy JP, Kumar N, Chatterjee P, Jaiswal A. The clinical utility of cycle of threshold value of Gene Xpert MTB/RIF (CBNAAT) and its Diagnostic accuracy in pulmonary and extra pulmonary samples at a tertiary care centre in India. 2018.IJTB-283; [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Panda RK, Dash DJ. To study the usefulness of Catridge Based Nuclear Acid Amplification Test (CBNAAT) in bronchoalveoar samples in the diagnosis of sputum references page 97 Negative patients with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Pul & Res Sci. 2019;4(2):555632. [crossref]
19.
Bhattacharya P, Talukdar K, Barman B, Jamil Md, Phukan P, Mobing H. Clinical spectrum and medical comorbidities in tuberculosis: A hospital-based study in northeast India. Cureus. 2020;12(9):e10580. Doi: 10.7759.10580. [crossref]
20.
Bharadwaj AK, Singh G, Mahajan K, Chauhan G, Chandwani C. Relation of clinical features with microbiological findings in children of suspected Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research. Doi: 10.7860/ IJNMR/2020/43453.2261.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64685.18292

Date of Submission: Apr 12, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 16, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 31, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jul 05, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 08, 2023 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com